For over thrity years Roman Polanski mister convinced the French that forcible sex with a drunken drugged thirteen year old girl was PERFECTLY NORMAL!
Amazing. Dumb ass Frenchies swallowed the guff. And made themselves look immortally stupid in process. As if anywhere outside of degenerate Islamic hinterlands such is considered healthy and logical.
For years, French persons were insisting 'no, Roman Polanksi is an important artist and creative genius, assuredly if he wuffed a thirteen year old it was tres bien'.
He forced himself on a child - for French, apparently nothing extraordinaire. Child rape common as daylight in France. In between smearing cheese, splashing pefrume, and smoking foul gitanes.
Pocque pocque pocque la belle Americaine stupide, c'est normale mon vieux!
Sorry, you goat-humping frogs, not even if she spread legs for entire French parliament saying "come bang me big boys" would it be passable. Thirteen years old! Merde!
What you were thinking!
But you were so pleased that he sought France to hide out, having in nowadays era so very few men of talent at all in France that one more no matter how ethically and morally crippled was welcome addition. A vrai intellectuel! And she only une Yanquie! Ne pas de probleme!
And we all know what you lot think about sex anyways, do we not?
Anything better than the English style. Turn portrait of old lady to wall and do it rigorously with someone younger. Plus, you despise the Americans.
Now it bites. You look pretty silly protecting international pervert. Thirty years, what? Are you proud of that? Artisitic pretentions, oui, yet nothing more than a common rogue.
Makes one wonder how many French thirteen year olds he got to while there. And how many of those found him in any case far cleaner than French rapists.
Probably bit of a relief not having poxy frog whiffing in the old featherbed.
Life a living hell in France, but not all stinko at all times, merci bonne dieu.
Go one, have some more wine, silly French chappies. It will help you forget that you gladly hosted a man who cannot be trusted with your daughters.
Any of them, maybe even all of them.
For making fools out of you he deserves a medal.
After being killed for being a horrid degenerate first, of course.
Alors enfants de la patrihihiya, le jour de gloire est arrivee! Pom pom, pom pom, pohom pom pom, pompompom pom, da da daa da daha daaaaaa!
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Get your pnaties outta my face!
The nerve of that child! First she waves her panties in my face, then she refuses my kind responsive attentions! I am all of the flutter accordingly! And quite quite infuriated!
Here I had striven to argua her into accepting my reasoned contention, yet she denies! Denies!
I speak, of course naturally, of the utterly evil and possibly luscious and tempting miss Snooky Wong, writer of Death By Noodles, which I never read, and columnist for the Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers, a respectable outfit of which I too am contributing.
AND I SAY: BITCH!
Your excesses are greater than a first cup of coffee!
How you dare use my very own highly literate postings to argue and aver that I am obsessed with Richard Becker's penis?! How you dare, I say!
Completely - not - interested - in - the slightest - small - penis of - Richard buggery Becker!
A literary fancy, pure and simple!
The fact that his manhood is minute and smoothly undeveloped is a matter of record. I am merely stating the well-known. I have no personal state in his teenie weenie little winkipoo. Quite not! No one does! Not even the zesty venomtress Lily Haskell! We hear she swings elsewheres in some other case. Though she too is heartfelt in her lust for Arabs and their brutish cause.
Richard Becker's tiny little dinglewangle is of no importance to the cause. Merely typical of many anti-Semitic ponces and faulty individuals. That he matches in queen size miss Haskell, well, too bad and not enough. Both are in same regard.
And I should ask, has any one seen them in the same place at the same time?
So no, my dear miss Wong, delicious Snooky B., I have no investment in Richard Becker's penis. It is far too small and inconsequent. No appeal utterly. Probably smells bad. Evil thumbtack.
You, however, seem to have it on your mind.
Here I had striven to argua her into accepting my reasoned contention, yet she denies! Denies!
I speak, of course naturally, of the utterly evil and possibly luscious and tempting miss Snooky Wong, writer of Death By Noodles, which I never read, and columnist for the Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers, a respectable outfit of which I too am contributing.
AND I SAY: BITCH!
Your excesses are greater than a first cup of coffee!
How you dare use my very own highly literate postings to argue and aver that I am obsessed with Richard Becker's penis?! How you dare, I say!
Completely - not - interested - in - the slightest - small - penis of - Richard buggery Becker!
A literary fancy, pure and simple!
The fact that his manhood is minute and smoothly undeveloped is a matter of record. I am merely stating the well-known. I have no personal state in his teenie weenie little winkipoo. Quite not! No one does! Not even the zesty venomtress Lily Haskell! We hear she swings elsewheres in some other case. Though she too is heartfelt in her lust for Arabs and their brutish cause.
Richard Becker's tiny little dinglewangle is of no importance to the cause. Merely typical of many anti-Semitic ponces and faulty individuals. That he matches in queen size miss Haskell, well, too bad and not enough. Both are in same regard.
And I should ask, has any one seen them in the same place at the same time?
So no, my dear miss Wong, delicious Snooky B., I have no investment in Richard Becker's penis. It is far too small and inconsequent. No appeal utterly. Probably smells bad. Evil thumbtack.
You, however, seem to have it on your mind.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Death by Noodles is a horrid mistress!
Heavens, little miss Wong! You again overlook my contributions to PIBB and focus on the unimportant; your own. Of which there are about three minor scribblings, I grant you. But mine you do not mention! At all!! How could you!!!
Hah!
Nor did you react, in any way at all, to my recipe for Parsee Prawn Curry!
Soon I shall have to offer it instead to Richard Becker, if he will but let me photograph his tiny penis, and take a wax impression, so that I may prove to you, in several blown up color photographs, and a plaster model, that I speak the truth, I spoke the truth.
It is small. It is but that you would not believe me when I asserted that little fact that you now ignore me, I doubt it not!
Despite the several scriptural kindnesses I have shown you. But nay! And no!
You wished proof of my valid claim that Richard Becker is blessed with a matchbox-sized lora, or even smaller, as befits a notorious communist from a comfortable armchair, who is desiring to entirely without danger to himself or evidences leading back to him, or the beneficiaries of his mini-me, instigate, stir-up, and outside-agitate for violent revolution and the bloody extinguishment of Jews and other fine peoples. As is utterly the balanced and considered opinion of myself, a discriminating and perspicacious lawyer.
You insisted upon it!
RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS (or had a tiny penis, when last we could ascertain, at a moments before this writing).
DO NOT DARE DISPUTE! IT IS SMALL. MINUTE!
And it is rather cute. As ugly little dingusses go.
It eats cheese.
I SHALL NOW REPEAT: RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS! RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS!!! ALL OF INTERNATIONAL ANSWER HAS TINY PENISES!!!!!!!
It is smaller than a shrimp. And concerning which, if you intend on cooking that shrimp curry of which the receipt I wrote, do NOT overcook the shrimp. It will turn tough and tasteless if you do. As well as limp and greasy, and altogether nasty and communistic. Plus pink and somewhat wrinkled, and shrivelly entirely.
Hah!
Nor did you react, in any way at all, to my recipe for Parsee Prawn Curry!
Soon I shall have to offer it instead to Richard Becker, if he will but let me photograph his tiny penis, and take a wax impression, so that I may prove to you, in several blown up color photographs, and a plaster model, that I speak the truth, I spoke the truth.
It is small. It is but that you would not believe me when I asserted that little fact that you now ignore me, I doubt it not!
Despite the several scriptural kindnesses I have shown you. But nay! And no!
You wished proof of my valid claim that Richard Becker is blessed with a matchbox-sized lora, or even smaller, as befits a notorious communist from a comfortable armchair, who is desiring to entirely without danger to himself or evidences leading back to him, or the beneficiaries of his mini-me, instigate, stir-up, and outside-agitate for violent revolution and the bloody extinguishment of Jews and other fine peoples. As is utterly the balanced and considered opinion of myself, a discriminating and perspicacious lawyer.
You insisted upon it!
RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS (or had a tiny penis, when last we could ascertain, at a moments before this writing).
DO NOT DARE DISPUTE! IT IS SMALL. MINUTE!
And it is rather cute. As ugly little dingusses go.
It eats cheese.
I SHALL NOW REPEAT: RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS! RICHARD BECKER HAS A TINY PENIS!!! ALL OF INTERNATIONAL ANSWER HAS TINY PENISES!!!!!!!
It is smaller than a shrimp. And concerning which, if you intend on cooking that shrimp curry of which the receipt I wrote, do NOT overcook the shrimp. It will turn tough and tasteless if you do. As well as limp and greasy, and altogether nasty and communistic. Plus pink and somewhat wrinkled, and shrivelly entirely.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Pakistanis full of themselves
Recently the Pakistanis demanded that the British stop pressuring them so much regarding terrorists, and averred that due to their efforts, much terror had been averted.
As per articles in various place, including The Guardian, to which horrid journal I shall not link!
Pakis claim that they have pursued suspects with great enthusiasm.
Of course they have!
Pursued training them, and enabling them, that is!
No one in their righteous mind would trust nor believe that the Pakistanis had anything other to do with the war on terror than keeping it ongoing by their funding and support of extremists, murderers, and drugdealers involved with ISI and the Taleban. Anything else is absurd.
As per articles in various place, including The Guardian, to which horrid journal I shall not link!
Pakis claim that they have pursued suspects with great enthusiasm.
Of course they have!
Pursued training them, and enabling them, that is!
No one in their righteous mind would trust nor believe that the Pakistanis had anything other to do with the war on terror than keeping it ongoing by their funding and support of extremists, murderers, and drugdealers involved with ISI and the Taleban. Anything else is absurd.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Are Parsees farklempt?
This calendar ? The Shahanshahi calendar is wrong by thirty days at all times from the kadimi, and neither hew to the rigid flexibility of the fasili sal. Which, of course, is both logical and correct. But and therefore utterly wrong.
12 x 30, plus five days.
Plus one, if you are a hereticus.
The kadimi calendar has the support of three atash beherams plus the simple peasantry of Yazd, by reason of the completely wrong pronunciations instituted (for absolutely all the right reasons) by the much-respected mister Firoz Kaws Dastar two centuries ago. The other five atash beherams contrariwise follow the correct pronunciation and rigidly the wrong calendar.
Both standard behdini and kushnumi are equally as divided. And on these bases we discriminate against our own. A house divided, as they say, toppels in plural directions.
In many ways the case of that French woman was much more simple. Even though it made of an egalitarian religion a caste and ethnic entity, and opened the door to the exclusion of those with a non-Parsee parent.
Admit any John Doe Irani, but shriek angrily if an outsider enters. Wail, wail, wail.
It is enough to make one disbelief.
12 x 30, plus five days.
Plus one, if you are a hereticus.
The kadimi calendar has the support of three atash beherams plus the simple peasantry of Yazd, by reason of the completely wrong pronunciations instituted (for absolutely all the right reasons) by the much-respected mister Firoz Kaws Dastar two centuries ago. The other five atash beherams contrariwise follow the correct pronunciation and rigidly the wrong calendar.
Both standard behdini and kushnumi are equally as divided. And on these bases we discriminate against our own. A house divided, as they say, toppels in plural directions.
In many ways the case of that French woman was much more simple. Even though it made of an egalitarian religion a caste and ethnic entity, and opened the door to the exclusion of those with a non-Parsee parent.
Admit any John Doe Irani, but shriek angrily if an outsider enters. Wail, wail, wail.
It is enough to make one disbelief.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
US State Department: Jerusalem is capitol of Palestine
Per the US State Department, as reflected by the United States Consul General, Jerusalem is NOT the capitol of Israel, despite the knesset and government ministries being located there - it is the capitol of Palestine, even though the Palestinian authority is headquartered in Ramallah.
Yes, that is a US government representative that stated that. Your tax dollars at work.
The consulate's website did not mention Israel in any way, and referred only to Palestinian affairs.
A letter requesting clarification received this response:
"Thank you for your feedback on the U.S. Consulate General Jerusalem's Website. Just to clarify, the Consulate General in Jerusalem is the principal representation to the Palestinian Authority. We also provide services to American citizens in Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza.
"The U.S. embassy to Israel is in Tel Aviv and is focused on the bilateral relationship with Israel. Their website is http://usembassy-israel.org.il/. The American Center in Jerusalem also provides information about the United States to the Israeli public. Their website is http://usembassy-israel.org.il/ac/ .
"Jerusalem is a final status issue. Israel and the Palestinians have agreed to resolve its status during negotiations. We will support their efforts to reach agreements on all final status issues."
SOURCE:
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/08/is-this-us-policy-recognize-east.html
It would appear that the State Department has unilaterally decided to deviate from official US policy.
The United States Jerusalem Embassy Act (1995):
"Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel; and the United States Embassy in Israel should be established in Jerusalem no later than May 31, 1999".
Section 214 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 2003:
"The Congress maintains its commitment to relocating the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem ... "
U.S House of Representatives concurrent resolution 152 (June 5, 2007):
"Commends Israel for its administration of the undivided city of Jerusalem for the past 40 years, during which Israel has respected the rights of all religious groups; Reiterates its commitment to the provisions of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 and calls upon the President and all United States officials to abide by its provisions"
Despite the Jerusalem Embassy Act being suspended annually by the president in a futile act of pandering to the Europeans and Arabs, the Administration "remains committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem".
In consequence, official U.S. documents and web sites refer to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Perhaps the State Department considers itself a separate country? Not part of the United States at all?
It's quite possible, after all they do seem at times to act quite contrary to American interests.
Feel free to query Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about this matter.
She is currently at this address:
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street North West,
Washington, DC 20520.
202-647-4000
If you send her a letter, please be polite and courteous, like you would to a leader of a foreign nation, or one of our erstwhile allies who needs to be won over to our side. Do not bring up secondary matters, and keep your epistle simple. Thank you.
==========================================================
Crossposted at Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers: http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/
==========================================================
Yes, that is a US government representative that stated that. Your tax dollars at work.
The consulate's website did not mention Israel in any way, and referred only to Palestinian affairs.
A letter requesting clarification received this response:
"Thank you for your feedback on the U.S. Consulate General Jerusalem's Website. Just to clarify, the Consulate General in Jerusalem is the principal representation to the Palestinian Authority. We also provide services to American citizens in Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza.
"The U.S. embassy to Israel is in Tel Aviv and is focused on the bilateral relationship with Israel. Their website is http://usembassy-israel.org.il/. The American Center in Jerusalem also provides information about the United States to the Israeli public. Their website is http://usembassy-israel.org.il/ac/ .
"Jerusalem is a final status issue. Israel and the Palestinians have agreed to resolve its status during negotiations. We will support their efforts to reach agreements on all final status issues."
SOURCE:
http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/08/is-this-us-policy-recognize-east.html
It would appear that the State Department has unilaterally decided to deviate from official US policy.
The United States Jerusalem Embassy Act (1995):
"Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel; and the United States Embassy in Israel should be established in Jerusalem no later than May 31, 1999".
Section 214 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 2003:
"The Congress maintains its commitment to relocating the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem ... "
U.S House of Representatives concurrent resolution 152 (June 5, 2007):
"Commends Israel for its administration of the undivided city of Jerusalem for the past 40 years, during which Israel has respected the rights of all religious groups; Reiterates its commitment to the provisions of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 and calls upon the President and all United States officials to abide by its provisions"
Despite the Jerusalem Embassy Act being suspended annually by the president in a futile act of pandering to the Europeans and Arabs, the Administration "remains committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem".
In consequence, official U.S. documents and web sites refer to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Perhaps the State Department considers itself a separate country? Not part of the United States at all?
It's quite possible, after all they do seem at times to act quite contrary to American interests.
Feel free to query Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about this matter.
She is currently at this address:
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street North West,
Washington, DC 20520.
202-647-4000
If you send her a letter, please be polite and courteous, like you would to a leader of a foreign nation, or one of our erstwhile allies who needs to be won over to our side. Do not bring up secondary matters, and keep your epistle simple. Thank you.
==========================================================
Crossposted at Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers: http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/
==========================================================
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Jews my genius finally recognize!
And huzzah for that! I am in receipt of an invite to join the Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers, that being a very fine establishment at this precise address: http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/
The only reason I can think for this kindly invite is that my perspicacity has not gone unnoticed.
So of course I said yes. I am an afficionado of clever people, such as the other commenters on that blog are. No doubt.
And I have placed my first post, which you may admire here:
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/08/pakistanis-blame-zionist-for-dead.html
I could not have said it better.
But in all serious, this looks like a most worthwhile venture. And I urge you to visit there often. Not that I shall post much - I am not the best advocate of any cause, being more of an intellectual property right attorney and fondly obsessing over issues that aare not germane to that cause - but the other contributors appear to be doing a very fine job of fighting the good fight. And I would encourage them.
Thank you.
The only reason I can think for this kindly invite is that my perspicacity has not gone unnoticed.
So of course I said yes. I am an afficionado of clever people, such as the other commenters on that blog are. No doubt.
And I have placed my first post, which you may admire here:
http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/08/pakistanis-blame-zionist-for-dead.html
I could not have said it better.
But in all serious, this looks like a most worthwhile venture. And I urge you to visit there often. Not that I shall post much - I am not the best advocate of any cause, being more of an intellectual property right attorney and fondly obsessing over issues that aare not germane to that cause - but the other contributors appear to be doing a very fine job of fighting the good fight. And I would encourage them.
Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)